Trump Says EV Drivers Are Crazy, Have a 'Disease' [VIDEO]

Not a Tesla App
Nehal Malik

Political rhetoric surrounding electric vehicles is heating up once again on the campaign trail. Speaking at a rally at the Red Rock Resort in Las Vegas, President Trump had some choice words for electric vehicle owners, mocking range anxiety and claiming that drivers worrying about battery levels have a “disease.”

Trump brought up electric transport during a broader speech on regulatory policy. Addressing the crowd, he claimed credit for ending what he called an electric mandate, stating:

“I ended the electric mandate. I don’t want to talk about it because Elon wasn’t exactly thrilled with me, but I had to do it. We love Elon.”

He then pivoted to mocking EV owners who constantly keep an eye on their state of charge while on long highway trips:

“I ended [it] because it said that within a very short period of time, like 2030, everybody had to have an electric car — even though there was no way you could charge it. You ever see the signs? You’re driving along [in] an electric car, they have a disease, you know, it’s a disease… they’re driving and they realize their battery’s getting low, and they start thinking about it when it’s 3/4 full. Okay, it loses a little bit, so ‘where am I going to [go]?’ And you’re driving down the highway and you’ll see a sign — charging station, with an arrow, 89 miles to the right. These people are crazy.”

You can watch the entire clip below:

Segment begins at the 43:32 mark of the video.

Mandates, Market Share, and Political Dynamics

Despite repeated rally claims, no federal law ever required that American consumers buy an EV by 2030. The executive actions Trump referenced actually targeted federal tailpipe emission standards and state-level clean air regulations that encouraged automakers to make more EVs.

Trump also cited a 7% market share figure for battery-electric vehicles in the U.S., pointing to the number as evidence of weak driver demand. All of this comes amid shifting political alliances in Washington. The administration’s rollback of clean energy incentives followed an earlier public feud between Trump and Elon Musk after the CEO briefly led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in early 2025. Musk has since stepped away from Washington, recently admitting he got too involved in politics before refocusing on Tesla and the rest of his companies.

The Long-Term Economics of Electric Transport

While political debates continue, the underlying transition toward electric drivetrains remains grounded in engineering and economics. Electric vehicles are fundamentally more energy efficient and environmentally friendly than internal combustion engines, even when accounting for manufacturing, battery production, and current power grid mixes.

Because electric cars rely on regional utility grids, they’re the only powertrain that automatically gets cleaner over time as power generation becomes cleaner and transitions to renewable sources. Moving away from fossil fuels lowers long-term household transportation costs while also reducing the U.S.’s dependence on imported oil.

Like every major technology shift, electric vehicles carried higher upfront costs during early commercialization. However, rapid manufacturing scaling by Tesla and Chinese manufacturers has brought purchase prices down toward parity with internal combustion engines, and EVs actually win out on total cost of ownership thanks to cheaper fuel and lower maintenance.

The range anxiety that Trump painted as a “disease” has also been all but solved by modern high-capacity battery packs and widespread Superchargers. What’s more, it’s becoming even less of a problem as charging networks expand across major transit corridors.